For my less seminary inclined readers, feel free to skip this book review, however I am going to start with two stories.
A helpful way to evaluate this book will be to compare it to contemporary evangelical Christian practice. So, I start with two stories.
First, about a month ago I was down in Old Town Pasadena with my INFJ friend (Curtis, this friend has become a stock character in many of my posts so to get the allusion you’d have to read some of my non-class related posts). This random guy walked up to us and handed us each a tract and a flyer. He asked us if we were saved and implored us to come to a Christian concert several blocks away. My friend was immediately turned off. I talked to the guy for a while because I was hoping he could tell me where he got his shiny tracts printed up (I was thinking my tracts would look really cute on such shiny paper). As we walked away by name he reminded me to go to the concert while having already forgotten my friend.
Second, when I was thirteen my Sunday school teachers would always warn us about the danger of backsliding if we had non-Christian friends. They were convinced that non-Christians would convert us out of the faith. Not only were they worried about non-Christian friends at school but also about post-Christian friends that had once been part of our church. I hate to admit it, but for fear of backsliding at numerous times in my life I have cut off friends.
So, as I turn to Donald McGavran’s The Bridges of God, it will be helpful to keep those stories in mind.
Chapter 1:
From 1800-1914, which is considered the great missionary century, the focus of missions was on spreading Christ to one individual at a time. Regardless of class, culture, caste or race missionaries tried to convert individuals one at a time.
Chapter 2:
At this time all the missionaries were either from the west or had been educated by westerners. This meant, that anything other than a personal, individual conversion was seen as dubious.
So, as missionaries went around converting individuals, what happened was that community life for the individual was destroyed. The missionaries were trying to convert people out of families, clans, tribes and castes. Once individuals were effectively snatched out of their own cultures they would join the culture of the missionaries at mission stations. These stations would have schools, churches, orphanages, hospitals and homes for the missionaries and quarters for the large staff of indigenous workers. Many people who converted had no other option but to live and work at the mission station since they had been pulled out of their own culture.
McGavran here argues that this was devastating both for mission and for indigenous people. McGavran wanted to see people’s entire communal social life come under the sphere of Christ while staying in their original culture. So rather than convert individuals he was hoping to see families, chains of families and tribes collectively come to Christ as a community.
Chapter 3:
McGavran looks at how missions happened in the New Testament. Jesus, Peter and Paul did not focus on converting individuals but groups of people. Often times the Bible records large groups of people accepting Christ.
This has important implications. For instance, when the Samaritans were converted, they came in large numbers. If this had not happened, they would have had a very difficult time integrating into Jewish Christian society. For example, it would have been very difficult for Samaritans to find spouses among Jewish Christians. So a large group conversion made the process much easier.
Further, not only did large groups come into together, but missions would spread along relational lines out from these groups. For instance, when Paul wrote the letter of Romans before he was going to actually go do missions in Rome, he already had a large social network that he knew in Rome. Although it is easy to miss, there is a high likelihood Paul was doing mission amongst people’s familial networks.
Chapter 4:
This type of conversion is not just limited to the New Testament. When the tribes of northern Europe were evangelized it was not done through individual conversions. Rather, whole groups would come to faith when their leaders moved in that direction.
Further, during the Reformation, individuals, families, clans, and provinces did not make individual decisions to either be Catholic or Protestant but group based decisions.
Chapter 5:
During the great missionary century this all changed. The issue was that Anglo-Europeans were trying to take the gospel into eastern countries. There were no natural relational bridges and because the westerners were industrialized and the easterns were not there was a huge cultural gap. This meant that even well intentioned missionaries could not live with the people they were working with.
So the missionaries built mission stations that were suitable to western living expectations. This meant that when indigenous people did convert they felt that they were not only converting to a different religion but a different culture.
What ended up happening was that there were very few converts. So the mission stations started to work on other things like orphanages, schools, and hospitals. These services would revolutionize the countries as generations of indigenous leaders were exposed to these ideas. However, very rarely did these leaders become Christian—rather they worked to create more schools and hospitals—but now nationally funded.
Chapter 6:
However, outside of the mission stations Christian movements were starting. McGavran calls these “God given people movements.” These movements had indigenous leaders, were often times resisted by mission stations, established local and sustainable churches that were indigenous, allowed for spontaneous expansion and could easily grow along relational lines. Further, the converts did not have a mixed motive of getting the cultural benefits of mission station life. Rather, these converts were still living in their own cultural context but now with a Christ focused life. During the great century of missions 90% of converts came from people movements even though they got almost none of the financial resources.
Chapter 7:
A lot of the reason for the discrepancy in funding was that mission boards were attached to the mission stations. Further, because very few missionaries left the mission station very few people realized that these people movements were going on.
Chapter 8:
McGavran calls for missionaries to hold onto mission stations lightly. Even though they were very expensive to build and took sacrifices of five decades or more to build they were hindering people movements. If the resources that were being used to maintain mission stations were in part transferred to people movements those movements could grow even faster.
Chapter 9:
The apostle Paul did not trouble himself with building schools, hospitals, orphanages, teaching complex doctrine, and preparing to convert people at some later date. Rather, Paul came to cities, converted people, organized leadership and then trust that God would do the rest and he would move on.
Chapter 10:
The mission stations are tremendously expensive to run and reach very few people. However, People Movements, with no buildings are cheap to run and reach many people.
Chapter 11:
McGavran calls for wide scale empirical study so people movements can be understood better. Here, I would critique him of being a modernist. Setting up controlled mission experiments reeks of an over emphasis on calculation.
Chapter 12:
Just like God delivered the Israelites out of bondage God wants to deliver contemporary people out of the darkness.
Although McGavran is speaking of missions going on in Asia and Africa in the 50’s by analogy I think it more than safe to say that he would critique the street corner evangelist who was trying to peel me away from my friend and Sunday school teachers that discourage interaction with non-Christians.